Stone retraction and incision at the level of Hartmann’s pouch during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases of stone impacted in the gallbladder neck: Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety
https://doi.org/10.63769/3034-008X-2026-1-1-62-73
Abstract
Aim. To compare outcomes of stone retraction and incision at the level of Hartmann’s pouch during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with a stone impacted in the gallbladder neck.
Materials and methods. A retrospective single-center comparative study included 104 patients with calculous cholecystitis and an intraoperatively confirmed impacted stone in the gallbladder neck. Stone retraction without opening the gallbladder wall was performed in 62 patients, while 42 underwent incision of the gallbladder wall at the level of Hartmann’s pouch with stone extraction followed by continuation of cholecystectomy. Clinical, demographic, intraoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, including complications graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification.
Results. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The overall complication rate was higher in the stone retraction group compared to the Hartmann’s pouch incision group (40.3 and 23.8 %, respectively; p = 0.044). Clinically significant complications (grade ≥IIIa per the Clavien–Dindo classification) occurred more frequently after stone retraction (22.6 % and 4.8 %, p = 0.014). No mortality was observed.
Conclusion. An impacted stone in the gallbladder neck may render standard dissection within the Calot’s triangle unsafe. Stone retraction is a reasonable initial step; however, early transition to incision at the level of the Hartmann’s pouch is advisable when it is ineffective. A stepwise algorithmic approach allows to decrease the rate of clinically significant complications and improve safety of the surgery.
About the Authors
D. S. KostyaevRussian Federation
Dmitry Sergeevich Kostyaev
23 Veshnyakovskaya St., Moscow 111539
9 Vysokovoltnaya St., Ryazan 390026
A. A. Natalskiy
Russian Federation
9 Vysokovoltnaya St., Ryazan 390026
3a Internatsionalnaya St., Ryazan 390039,
S. V. Ovchinnikov
Russian Federation
23 Veshnyakovskaya St., Moscow 111539
E. A. Keshyan
Russian Federation
23 Veshnyakovskaya St., Moscow 111539
1–6 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117513
P. V. Chavkin
Russian Federation
23 Veshnyakovskaya St., Moscow 111539
N. R. Khusainova
Russian Federation
1–6 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117513
F. D. Kochetkov
Russian Federation
9 Vysokovoltnaya St., Ryazan 390026
3a Internatsionalnaya St., Ryazan 390039
References
1. Ambartsumyan A.R., Chumak B.A., Deryagina L.E. et al. Criteria of formation of fatty liver disease in individuals of different age groups in the long-term period after minimally invasive cholecystectomy. Rossiysky mediko-biologichesky vestnik im. akad. I.P. Pavlova = I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald 2023;31(2):231–42. DOI: 10.17816/PAVL0VJ110948. (In Russ.)
2. Gupta V. How to achieve the critical view of safety for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Technical aspects. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023;27(2):201–10. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-064
3. Addasi R., Al-Sabe’ L., AlRawabdeh K. et al. Patient and surgeon predictors of achieving the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Front Surg 2025;12:1661510. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1661510
4. Abdallah H.S., Sedky M.H., Sedky Z.H. The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review. BMC Surg 2025;25(1):156. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02847-3
5. Alius C., Serban D., Bratu D.G. et al. When critical view of safety fails: A practical perspective on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023;59(8):1491. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081491
6. Tarasenko S.V., Romashov D.V., Panin I.V. et al. Surgical treatment of a female patient with Bouveret's syndrome. Nauka molodykh = Science of the young (Eruditio Juvenium) 2024;12(4):589–600. DOI: 10.23888/HMJ2024124589-600. (In Russ.)
7. Moosa H., Jaffer S., Naeem Khan M. et al. Mirizzi syndrome: Clinical Insights, diagnostic challenges, and surgical outcomes – a 5-year experience from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Qatar Med J 2025;2025(1):8. DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2025.8
8. Koo J.G.A., Tham H.Y., Toh E.Q. et al. Mirizzi syndrome – the past, present, and future. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023;60(1):12. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010012
9. Lai W., Yang J., Xu N. et al. Surgical strategies for Mirizzi syndrome: a ten-year single center experience. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022;14(2):107–19. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.107
10. Vlasov A.V., Panyushkin A.V., Zhidkov I.M., Baranova D.G. Bile ducts injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: current state of the problem. Vestnik khirurgii im. I.I. Grekova = Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery 2024;183(4):70–6. DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-4-70-76. (In Russ.)
11. Khadzhibayev F.A., Alidzhanov F.B., Gulomov F.K., Yarov Zh.B. Laparoscopic treatment оf Mirizzi syndrome. Zhurnal im. N.V. Sklifosovskogo “Neotlozhnaya meditsinskaya pomoshch” = Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care” 2021;10(3):567–74. DOI: 10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-3-567-574. (In Russ.)
12. Toro A., Teodoro M., Khan M. et al. Subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult acute cholecystitis: how to finalize safely by laparoscopy a systematic review. World J Emerg Surg 2021;16(1):45. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00392-x
13. Al-Azzawi M., Abouelazayem M., Parmar C. et al. A systematic review on laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: a lifesaving bailout or an incomplete operation? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024;106(3):205–12. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0008
14. Garzali I.U., Aburumman A., Alsardia Y. et al. Is fundus first laparoscopic cholecystectomy a better option than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2022;74(6):1797–803. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01403-5
15. Deng S.X., Sharma B.T., Ebeye T. et al. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: Evolution of technique at a single teaching hospital. Surgery 2024;175(4): 955–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.12.026
16. Gallaher J.R., Charles A. Acute cholecystitis: A review. JAMA 2022;327(10):965–75. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.2350
17. Evanson D.J., Elcic L., Uyeda J.W., Zulfiqar M. Imaging of gallstones and complications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2025;54(3):392–403. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.12.007
18. Froehlich M., Sodomin E.M., Fontenot T. et al. Mirizzi syndrome: The Trojan horse of gallbladder disease. Surg Open Sci 2024;18:103–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.006
19. Khalid A., Khalil K., Mehmood Qadri H. et al. Comparison of postoperative complications of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy according to the modified Clavien–Dindo classification system. Cureus 2023;15(8):e43642. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43642
20. Pretzsch E., Koliogiannis D., D’Haese J.G. et al. Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review. BJS Open 2022;6(6):zrac149. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149
21. Mansor S., Zaidi A., Habibullah M. et al. Early Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. When do risks seem imminent? Asian J Endosc Surg 2025;18(1):e70052. DOI: 10.1111/ases.70052
Review
For citations:
Kostyaev D.S., Natalskiy A.A., Ovchinnikov S.V., Keshyan E.A., Chavkin P.V., Khusainova N.R., Kochetkov F.D. Stone retraction and incision at the level of Hartmann’s pouch during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases of stone impacted in the gallbladder neck: Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety. Title. 2026;1(1):62-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.63769/3034-008X-2026-1-1-62-73
JATS XML
